Picture : @ANI/X
The Bombay high court has asked fugitive businessman Vijay Mallya when he intends to return to India and told his counsel it would not hear his plea against the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act unless he first submits himself to the HC jurisdiction.
According to media reports, Mallya, based in the UK since 2016, has filed two petitions in the HC — one challenging an order declaring him as a fugitive economic offender and the other questioning the constitutional validity of the 2018 Act.
The HC posed the question to the 70-year-old liquor baron, wanted in India to face trial on fraud and money laundering charges, on his return home while hearing his twin pleas.
A bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad made it clear to the embattled businessman’s counsel Amit Desai that it would not hear Mallya’s plea against the Act unless he first submits himself to the court’s jurisdiction.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate, opposed the pleas arguing fugitives should not be permitted to challenge the validity of an Act without being subjected to courts of the country.
He submitted to the court that the FEO Act was brought to ensure such persons do not abuse the law by staying away from the country and filing petitions through their lawyers.
Mehta told the court that extradition proceedings initiated against Mallya were at an advanced stage.
