Picture : Twitter / ANI
Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray in blistering attack has hit out at the BJP and former Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis for using central agencies to target his government . He was referring to arrest of minister Nawab Malik and ED raids on relatives .
You ask for the resignation of Nawab Malik. Tell me first, why did you ( BJP) support Mehbooba Mufti who had sympathy for Afzal Guru and Burhan Wani, Maharashtra CM Uddhav Thackeray in the state assembly was quoted as saying by ANI
In blistering attack while speaking in the assembly Uddhav said, if the BJP at the Centre wanted to jail him to come to power, it could do so but it should not harass family members. He hit out at the saffron party, three days after the ED froze his brother-in-law’s assets worth Rs 6.45 crore in an alleged case of money laundering.
“The way you have attacked my family and (want to) put me in jail… what is the use of exposing all these things? Court sees proof and decides… Put me in jail, I am not Krishna but can you say that you are not Kans? Thackeray asked.
“If you want to come to power, then come to power. But don’t do all these vicious things to come to power. Don’t harass our or anyone else’s family members. We never bothered your family members,” he added.
The ED conducted raids on Thackeray’s brother-in-law two weeks after the Income Tax department raided some people considered close to his son and environment minister Aaditya Thackeray as well as Sena leader Anil Parab. The Sena has accused the BJP of political vendetta.
Saying opposition leader Devendra Fadnavis “must be recruited by the ED”, Thackeray made more accusations. He asked, “If Nawab Malik had a connection with Dawood Ibrahim for years, what were the central agencies doing for so many years? The matter is in court. I think LoP (leader of opposition) Fadnavis must be recruited by the ED as he gave all the documents to the ED as he said somewhere.”
Sena MP Sanjay Raut had claimed that the ED action against Thackeray’s brother-in-law stemmed from “political vendetta and portends monstrous dictatorship”. Raut had accused judiciary, administration and central probe agencies of behaving as if they were “slaves to dictatorial tendencies” and added justice could not be expected from courts in the atmosphere prevailing at present.
