With several state administrations flattening the houses of those involved in criminal cases with bulldozers, the Supreme Court has questioned how can anybody’s house be demolished just because he is an accused.
According to PTI, The court said it will lay down the guidelines on the issue that would be enforceable across the country.
“How can anybody’s house be demolished only because he is an accused? Even if he is a convict, still it can’t be done without following the procedure as prescribed by law,” a bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan said.
The court, however, said it will not protect any unauthorised construction or encroachment on public roads.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Uttar Pradesh, referred to an earlier affidavit filed by the state in the matter.
He said the affidavit states that merely because a person was alleged to have been a part of some offence can never be a ground for demolition of his immovable property.
Mehta said the state has said that demolition of an immovable property can take place ‘only for violation of and in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the respective applicable municipal law or law governing development authorities of the area’.
REacting to the Supreme Court observation, Former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Samajwadi party Chief Akhilesh Yadav tweeted on X
‘अन्याय के बुलडोज़र’ से बड़ा होता है, ‘न्याय का तराज़ू’। pic.twitter.com/YAh7laag69
— Akhilesh Yadav (@yadavakhilesh) September 2, 2024
